Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Cheating Today



Actually I've been cheating for the last couple of weeks since our son went to blow up things in the Las Vegas desert, we're building a house, I may have to sue some people in Florida, and I'm having trouble getting the electrician to show up. Not a lot of time for other things like concentrating so I'm cheating. Actually the subject is about paying attention to only certain things so take a look at this article from Marketminder.com (again) and learn to ignore thinking that only gets in the way of getting rich. Here goes---



The Myth of One



9/12/2007 |



Right now, you’re reading this column and your mind is focused on each sentence. That’s a marvelous and miraculous thing your brain is doing! The ability to focus on one thing is an incredible feat of focus allowing us to accomplish much in life. But there’s a big drawback: While you’re focusing on this column, there’s a whole world of activity your brain is ignoring!




That pain in your back, the chatty co-worker across the room, the phone that won’t stop ringing, the fly buzzing around your head…where did all those pesky thoughts go? None of them ceased to exist, you just stopped paying attention for a few seconds.




Blocking extraneous issues from our minds and directing our focus towards what’s most relevant is a nifty feature of the human brain: We’re actually designed to ignore most of what’s going on around us. Human brains—and those of many animals—are made to focus and reduce situations to actionable, understandable steps. We can’t keep a whole lot of information at the forefront of our consciousness for very long. At best, we can hold on to a few items at a time, but mostly we just focus on one thing or we’ll forget it.




That’s because evolution designed the brain as a hierarchical thing—receiving stimulus from the outside world and running the data through various neural unconscious systems (which account for the vast majority of brain activity) and deciding what, if any, information is worth bringing to your actual frontal lobes (where most of your consciousness is believed to reside). You’ll never even know about most of what your brain does or perceives!




That’s a great thing because nobody wants to be thinking about regulating their heartbeat, digesting this morning’s cinnamon raisin bagel, or focusing the lenses in their eyeballs to read the newspaper every second of the day. Our unconscious brains do all that heavy lifting so we can put our attention on other issues.




Only problem is, the brain’s tendency to block out extraneous information can be a very hazardous thing for investors.




I like to call most of today’s financial media pundits disciples of the “Myth of One.” That is, most stories we read today tend to focus on one issue alone as if that was the only thing moving stocks. “Oh, stocks were down today because housing starts fell last month!” or “Stocks went up because mortgage loan demand was higher than expected in August!” (Really? Since when are we suddenly all so focused on mortgage demand as the seminal market moving issue?)




The reality is millions upon millions of factors are acting on the market at any given time. But our brains can’t live with that idea so we write and read stories about single factors as if they were the only relevant thing. How absurd! But that’s how our brains work—we’re just not made to see the big picture. (In fact, our brains are so blind no one seems to notice corporate earnings are easily surpassing expectations this year!) Today the singular mythic issue is credit and housing, yesterday it was energy prices and carry trades, and tomorrow it will be something else. That’s your brain tricking you into the Myth of One.




It seems impossible to truly understand what’s going on in markets if we can only focus on a few measly issues at a time. What can we do?




One useful strategy is to put things into perspective. Often when investors get too focused on a single issue it gets blown far out of proportion. A great example is last week’s US employment report. Investors headed for the hills as the S&P 500 relinquished more than 1.5%–supposedly all for a job contraction of 4,000. When we consider a workforce of over 153 million, 4,000 jobs account for less than one thousandth of a percent of the employee base. How silly! There’s virtually no way such a small thing could account for such a big move. That tells you investors irrationally fell prey to the Myth of One. If you can see that, you’ve put the issue into perspective and gotten ahead of the game. Read more about the employment issue here:








Ultimately, you’re just going to have to live with the brain you’ve got. But that doesn’t mean you have to buy in to the myth that just one story alone moves global markets at any given time.








Monday, July 14, 2008

House Flipping In The Real World-Part 7-Doing The Numbers



As they say at NPR, when we do the numbers we find that, well, it depends on how you do the numbers. Analysis is in the eye of the beholder. Just ask any finance guy told to justify the corporate jet. I prefer, with a few twists, to do the cash in, cash out method so here goes.



The HUD asking price was $39,900. I got it for $27,000 after some long negotiations. Dealing with HUD is tricky so a realtor that specializes in this is important. HUD picks the realtor and the realtor cannot opine on a bid but they will do so in code. "They may have an issue with this" means too low. "Perhaps in the ballpark" means you got it. Anyway, as I said before, you make money when you buy the house, not when you sell it.



Here are the cash flows (Sorry about the numbers going all over the place, programming ignorance):



Money out



Purchase Price $27,000



Maintenance/Repair 3,400



Property Taxes 3 Years 3,600



Insurance 600



Freddy and Celia Closing Costs 3,500



Foreclosure Legal Fees 750



Back Taxes and Penalties 3,000



Patricia Sale Closing Costs 500



Total Out 42,350





Money In



Rent $16,275



Freddy/Celia Mortgage Payments 7,920



Patricia Sale Proceeds 49,000



Total In 73,195



ROI = Cash In minus Cash Out divided by Cash Out=$73,195-$42,350=$30,845 divided by $42,350=72.8%. Not too shabby, at first glance. I held the property for 4.5 years so the annual return is 72.8% divided by 4.5 years equals 16.2%.



At this point, any analyst out there worth anything should be shouting "Wrong, wrong." And they would be right. You can't divide 72.8% by 4.5 years because it ignores the time value of money and a few other things but that's my story and I'm sticking to it.



There is a more glaring error. There is no expense in there for me but let's not quibble.



Let's do look at what is in there--The cost to renovate the house was only $3,400 because I did most of the work myself. It was a controllable variable. Uncontrollable variables are property taxes and penalties ($7,600), insurance ($600), closing costs ($4,000) and legal fees ($750). Actually, closing costs can be reduced significantly by avoiding real estate agents as I did with Patricia but it ain't a done deal yet so an agent still may be necessary.



What ate up a large amount of cash was FEES and you cannot avoid them but most people forget about them. If you invest in real estate, don't forget them.



BUT we still haven't come up with the most GLARING error in the analysis. The Donald and Co. would say "Don't do it this way. Use OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY." Let's try that. You put 20% down and borrow the rest for repairs and everything else at 10%. So that is $5,400 for the downpayment and $15,350 for everything else and 4.5 years of interest payments=$31,899 plus the interest not paid you for the downpayment but let's not split hairs. Income of $73,195 minus expenses of $31,899 generates a return of $41,296 divided by $31,899 for a return of 129%, or an annual return of 29% doing it my way.



Not bad. In fact, great. The Donald is vindicated except for the fact that OPM is based on the assumption the OP are either idiots or charities because...



Who is going to lend you this money? Not HUD. Oh, there may be a government program out there that will lend you the money but I don't know about it and I wouldn't qualify. Maybe you would but I doubt it. Will a bank lend it? Lend $31,899 for a property worth currently, maybe $27,000? Remember OPM assumes you can borrow just about everything. I don't think so. Maybe Mom and Dad will lend it. Give it a try. Or private individuals may lend it but they will charge a lot more interest and take a lot more of the profits.



Please feel free to take a whack at the analysis or come up with a better one. I'm going to send this to a friend that is much better at finance than me so we will see what he has to say. For now my head is spinning and I probably made some major mistake BUT no matter how you do it you will come up with the same conclusion--yes, you can make money in real estate but it isn't as easy or painless as the guys on TV would have you believe.



Saturday, July 12, 2008

Daily Screen for Thursday 6-26-08



I noticed that my screens were lacking stocks making new highs (especially on above average volume) and stocks making moves on above average volume across the board. The general market indices were higher but the leading stocks (the few we have left) were not supporting the moves. Overall, the NASDAQ and DOW are trading below their respective 200-day moving averages and are still trending downward on the weekly charts with resistance at the long term moving average.


I was able to pinpoint a few interesting candidates tonight with VISN as my highlighted stock, a stock that has made multiple blog posts since May.


Visionchina Media (VISN), 18.13, a stock I have been starting to profile in multiple blog posts over the past month as it seems to be getting support at the 50-day moving average. It was up almosy 10% today on volume 79% larger than average. It did slide to close the day but looks to be trading in an opportunity area. $15 to $18 is an area to grab shares.



6/4/08: VisionChina Media, Inc. (VISN) - $18.84


Potential Trade Set-up:

Entry: $16.00

Risk is set at 1.0% of total portfolio or $1,000 of $100k

Stop Loss is 10% or $14.72

Number of Shares: 781

Position Size is $12,500

Risk is $1.28

Target is $30 for a 10-to-1 risk/reward ratio.

A move back to $23 with a buy at $16 would be a 5-to-1 risk/reward trade.


Stocks making multiple screens tonight:

CVLT, MA, PPO, PSEM, SLH


Stocks of Interest:

AVAV, EIG, PPO, SLH, SXE, VISN


Aerovironment Inc. (AVAV), 28.64, the stock gapped up for a 14.79% gain today on volume 502% larger than the average. It looks as if the momentum is about to turn-up on this stock as it is now in new high territory


Employers Holdings (EIG), 20.39, the stock was up 2.21% on volume 43% larger than the average as it is now trading above the 200-d moving average. Up more than 30% since February.


Polypore International (PPO), 26.42, up more than 10% today on volume 38% larger than the average as the stock looks to make a new all-time high. It has more than doubled since the fall-out after the IPO debut last summer. Buys along the 50-d m.a. are ideal.



Solera Holdings (SLH), 27.85, up more than 5% today on volume slightly larger than the average as it continues to trend higher (ever so slowly).


Stanley (SXE), 33.20, an interesting stock that seems to be building a cup shaped base over the past seven months with some support at the 200-d m.a. Have some trouble with studder-steps in recent weeks but overall, the chart catches my eye on a weekly view.